20081020

Open Source acknowledged by the Data Quality community?

Here in Denmark I often feel that the Data Quality, Master Data Management and Business Intelligence field is pretty fearsome towards Open Source software. I think this largely has to do with lack of presence, a lot of prejudices and few established consultancy firms in this part of the world.

This is also why it's always a great surprise, and a good one, when you catch the interest of the international Data Quality venue. Last week I was in a correspondence with the guys over at Data Quality Pro who was building a new Open Source Data Quality page and we had a nice chat about the tools available and the opportunities out there. I'm very glad that people are showing interest and hopefully the Danish BI scene will also adapt to the wonderful world of Open Source software as we go along...

Talking about getting the word out, where should you "advertise" your Open Source product to the business world? I personally think it's hard work to market your product even though you're giving it away for free and you would think that people automatically rushed to your website ;) Of course everyone needs to be aware that the software is here and I try a lot to put the word out there on conferences, wikipedia, sourceforge, freshmeat, ohloh etc.. But let me raise this question to everybody involved with marketing software for no cost: How do you do it?

20081017

Why can't my masters thesis be more like my Open Source project?

Being a hard working student I sometimes have to question (and from time to time applaude) the practices of academia and the tools that we use to foster innovation, creativity and knowledge-sharing. My masters thesis subject is concerned with the development methods of open source communities and companies that try to enable community-based development of their products. Yesterday I was considering this quote:

"In the cathedral-builder view of programming, bugs and development problems are tricky, insidious, deep phenomena. It takes months of scrutiny by a dedicated few to develop confidence that you've winkled them all out." - Eric S. Raymond - The Cathredral and The Bazaar

Looking aside from the fact that it deals with programming and not writing a paper (and trying to grow global awareness and knowledge on a specific topic) I thought to myself, that the cathedral-builder process is pretty similar to the process of writing a masters thesis. There are pretty strict guidelines to follow, a lot of scrutiny involved and planning by a dedicated few - in my case myself and my supervisor.

So is there a room for another way, a more open process with distributed peers, continous redesign, short release-spans etc. Obviously there are things like wikipedia that provide this for topics of interest to the general public, but needless to say science projects often go beyond that level of information and have to deal with experiments, not just facts of life such as those in an encyclopedia.

Also there's the issue of academia culture. Ego and elitism doubtlessly play a big part in maintaining a high degree of secrecy and closeness of scientific endeavor. I'd love to see scientists work in a community-enabling fashion and then I'd love to contribute to one of those (or create my own for my masters these). Let's for example try something like this out and we'll be well under way:

  • "Bugtrackers" for all the items that needs investigations
  • "Source control management" and versioning systems for revisions of the paper(s)
  • Chatty mailing lists for peer review and discussions
  • "Continous integration" for managing/matching references and terms within the paper
  • Free availability to all underlying data, not just the published parts

The beauties of this would be similar to the beauties of open source. And particularly in academia there's a strong need to be able to track down who's done what and source control management and reference-management would greatly improve on that account. For evaluators it would be possible to see the actual changes made by each student in group work, for group-working students it would be possible to track the actual changes to the project (as opposed to having to read it all over again everytime you exchange documents)... Perhaps a more "open" science would be just what we need?

20081013

A day of releases!

I saw this morning that the new OpenOffice 3 is out! Congratulations to the OO.o crew, I'm enjoying using your product for my upcoming masters thesis :)

Today is also the day that DataCleaner 1.5 "snapshot" has been released. Here's the press release:

As we're moving steadily along towards the release of DataCleaner 1.5 we are fixing a few bugs and enhancing a lot of features. This leads to the desire to release our work since practically nothing has undergone changes that could destabilize the application since the 1.4 release. So today we're releasing DataCleaner 1.5 "snapshot". This also marks the first release under our new LGPL license.

Here are the changes from 1.4 so far:
  • Change of license to LGPL.
  • New profile: Date mask matcher.
  • New profile: Regex matcher.
  • More file types supported (.dat, .txt)
  • XML file support improved (.xml)
Although this is in principle a development/beta release, we feel that it would be worth working with for most of your profiling needs. So... Go on, download it, tell us what you think and we'll see you around!


I hope you all enjoy the new version of DataCleaner!

20081004

Fast as lightning!

Whoa! I just got through my Lightning Speak about eobjects.org and DataCleaner at the Open Source Days '08 conference about an hour ago. It was a great experience - very fun and kinda stressing (in the good, "get to the point"-kinda way) to have an alarm clock counting down for your 15 minutes of fame!

And in deed my presentation was very closely to the point. I wanted to tell people about the great creative projects at eobjects.org and especially about DataCleaner and the MetaModel project, which I dubbed a "derivative" project. My speak also quickly sketched the domain of data quality and people where nodding when I concluded that they all should download DataCleaner and give their datasources a quick profile the next time they worked on their projects.

You can download my slides here: http://eobjects.org/resources/download/opensourcedays.pdf

Unfortunately the format of the Ligthning Speak didn't allow for much time for comments and questions from the audience, but I hope and think that they had a good time!

20080908

Presenting DataCleaner at Open Source Days '08

The Open Source Days conference in Copenhagen have been growing steadily for the last couple of years. Some of you may know it by it's former name, LinuxForum, though. This year the conference is featuring a new concept: Lightning speaks. Lightning speaks are less comprehensive speaks by less profiled speakers that are not necessarily based upon a paper. This doesn't mean that the speaks will be less relevant, on the contrary I think we will see a lot of hyper-interesting "up and coming" speakers delivering early keynotes of major topics to come.

As you may have guessed by my enthusiasm about the Lightning Speak concept, I am speaking at this years Open Source Days conference on Sunday the 4th of October at 14:00! The topic will be DataCleaner and how the eobjects.dk (and now eobjects.org) community have delivered one of the leading open source Data Quality solutions within less than a year! Here's the official speak statement:

DataCleaner is the most advanced open source data quality solution available. You can use DataCleaner to profile, validate and compare your data in an intuitive graphical environment. The application is compliant with lots of datasources such as JDBC databases, CSV files, Excel spreadsheets, OpenOffice.org database-files and xml files. Among the interesting features are identification of string patterns, value distributions, dictionary lookups, javascripted validation rules, regular expression validation along with traditional metrics used for data profiling and analysis. Come to this lightning speak to listen to Kasper Sørensen, the founder of eobjects.dk and main developer of DataCleaner who will demonstrate DataCleaner and give a quick overview of what's going on with open source data quality.
I hope that if you're joining the conference you'll come and hear me out. And if you're not planning to come - then please reconsider ;) I'm very much looking forward to showing of our great product and I think it will be a lovely experience to get some more focus on data quality as well.

20080826

We're moving eobjects.dk to a new server

Hello everybody. This is a practical announcement ...

We're in the process of moving eobjects.dk to a new server.

Please return shortly to access the new and improved eobjects.dk!

Update

We're finally finished, but the IP address change will need some hours to cascade worldwide. If you're still being redirected to this page it's because the DNS changes haven't set in yet. The new eobjects.dk website is online! Impatient people who are suffering from the slow DNS cascades can also access the website directly by it's IP address (minor glitches is to be expected this way though).

Update

By now, all DNS changes should be complete så go ahead
enjoy the new eobjects.dk website

20080825

Development/snapshot release of DataCleaner 1.4

We've released a development/snapshot release of DataCleaner 1.4 in order to get early reactions for all the improvements and new features as well as supporting our users with up to date functionality. In my own opinion the development release is just as stable and "safe to use" as 1.3, but of course it lacks a bit of the manual testing that we put into the real releases.

You can download the development release at our sourceforge download site.

Here's a short list of fixes since DataCleaner 1.3:

  • Better memory handling and garbage collection
  • Reference columns in drill-to-details windows
  • Better error handling when loading schemas
  • Quoting of string values in visualized tables (in order to distinguish empty strings and white spaces)
  • New profile: Value Distribution, which is an improved version of the Repeated Values profile. The Value Distribution profile has an option to configure the top/bottom n values to include in the result.
  • Better control of profile result column width.
  • Bugfix: Copy to clipboard functions now work properly.
  • Bugfix: Scrollbars added to visualized tables.